People v. Manriquez
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, Acting P. J.
Defendant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), in return for a promise to strike two 5-year enhancement allegations charged under Penal Code section 667. It was also agreed that he would receive the upper term of six years, but that it would run concurrently with a four-year sentence recently imposed in a separate case, with full credits.
On this appeal, he asserts that he was confused when he pleaded guilty to burglary because he did not understand the elements of the offense and he thought he was pleading guilty to assault with a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. BreckenridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. CastelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.