Legal Opinion

People v. Mendez

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1999No. S066175PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

A defendant who has pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to a charge in the superior court, and who seeks to take an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered thereon, may not obtain review of so-called “certificate” issues, that is, questions going to the legality of the proceedings, including the validity of his plea, unless he has complied with section 1237.5 of the Penal Code1 and the first paragraph of rule 31(d) of the California Rules of Court2—which require him to file in the superior court a statement of certificate grounds as an intended notice of appeal within 60…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. LaudermilkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Jesus Garcia Delgado v. Gail Lewis, Deputy Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. People v. StampsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API