Legal Opinion

People v. Ballard

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1985No. A020259PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

A criminal defendant, convicted by plea of four felonies, contends on appeal that an unreasonable search and seizure, denial of discovery, entrapment, and the failure of his trial counsel adequately to pursue the defense of entrapment, all combine to compel reversal of his convictions.

Defendant's failure to comply with Penal Code section 1237.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 31(d) compels dismissal of the appeal.

Procedural History

By information filed March 23, 1982 (as amended June 8, 1982), the Marin County District Attorney accused defendant of 10 felonies, as follows: Counts I…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. HollandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. CastelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API