Legal Opinion

In Re Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1973No. Crim. 16641PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

The People were directed in response to petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus to show cause why the following orders should not be set aside: (1) order denying petitioner’s motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of robbery; and (2) order granting probation. We conclude that the remedy sought by petitioner is unavailable and that, in any event, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying her request to withdraw her guilty plea duly entered pursuant to a plea bargain.

Petitioner was charged with robbery, the information further alleging…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. FairbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Stevie Lamar FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API