Legal Opinion

People v. Breckenridge

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1992No. Docket Nos. H008358, H008997PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

5 Cal.App.4th 1096 (1992)

8 Cal. Rptr.2d 1

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

PATRICK BRECKENRIDGE, Defendant and Appellant. In re PATRICK BRECKENRIDGE on Habeas Corpus.

Docket Nos. H008358, H008997.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

April 23, 1992.

COUNSEL

Sally McGough, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, John H. Sugiyama, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher J. Wei and Mark S. Howell, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

[Opinion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. ArwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Marcotte v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Boehm v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. HoffardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Doe v. Allee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API