Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1956No. Civ. 21370PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from order probating holographic will of Jessie Alice Moore, deceased, after contest instituted before probate. Decedent never married. She left three sisters, two of whom, Margaret C. Farrell and Edna M. Nankervis, were named as executrices and are the proponents of the will. The other sister, Clara L. Barnes, and an only living brother, Herman K. Moore, contested probate upon the grounds of mental incompetence and undue influence exercised upon testatrix by the two proponents. Trial was had without a jury; the trial judge found that testatrix was mentally competent and that there was…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Estate of LauthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Kramer v. State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API