Kramer v. State Board of Accountancy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
This is a mandate proceeding. An amended accusation was filed before the State Board of Accountancy against Floyd J. Kramer, individually, and Kramer and Zueker, a copartnership consisting of Floyd J. Kramer and Marshall Zucker, 1 charging in effect (so far as here pertinent) that appellants 2 had prepared certain balance sheets for a client, stamping thereon “Prepared from Books of Accounts,” 3 although they knew they were not prepared from the books of accounts of the company; and that they delivered such balance sheets to the client. It was also charged that the last of these balance…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hohreiter v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Arenstein v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Grant v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Oksner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Ellis v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.