Guard v. County of Maricopa
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Mrs. Guard, pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 42-245 and 245.01, appealed to the superior court for the reason that she was dissatisfied with the valuation of her property. Although four parcels were involved in the lower court proceedings, the appellant’s contentions on appeal are with respect to only two improved parcels. We therefore confine our consideration to them.
PARCEL NO. 118-48-80
This property is located on North Central Avenue, adjacent to a lot located on the southwest corner of North Central and West Vernon Avenues, in Phoenix, Arizona. With respect to this parcel, it is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- McCluskey v. SparksArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Rieck Ice Cream Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Myrick v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- County of Maricopa v. ChatwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- STATE DES v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Harsh Building Company v. BialacCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.