Myrick v. Maloney
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Victoria Maloney appeals the denial of her request for attorney fees in a proceeding to modify parenting time and child support. 1 We affirm for the reasons that follow, and we issue an opinion to remove possible confusion regarding fees in this context. See Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 111(a), (b) (publication appropriate to clarify law or call attention to laws generally overlooked).
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 The current proceedings began in June 2013 when appellee Quentin Myrick filed a petition to modify parenting time pursuant to AR.S. § 25-403.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Hrudka v. HrudkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Standage v. StandageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Magee v. MageeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bobrow v. BobrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Sherman v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Hefner v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- In re the Marriage of FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.