Legal Opinion

Myrick v. Maloney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 29, 2014No. 2 CA-CV 2014-0019PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Victoria Maloney appeals the denial of her request for attorney fees in a proceeding to modify parenting time and child support. 1 We affirm for the reasons that follow, and we issue an opinion to remove possible confusion regarding fees in this context. See Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 111(a), (b) (publication appropriate to clarify law or call attention to laws generally overlooked).

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 The current proceedings began in June 2013 when appellee Quentin Myrick filed a petition to modify parenting time pursuant to AR.S. § 25-403.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Hrudka v. HrudkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Standage v. StandageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Magee v. MageeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bobrow v. BobrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Sherman v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Hefner v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. In re the Marriage of FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API