Harsh Building Company v. Bialac
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVENS, Judge.
This appeal is to review the decision of the trial court not to accept two stipulations entered into between the parties while litigating their case in federal court. Harsh Building Company and the other appellants (Harsh Building) were the defendants in an action commenced in the State court on 31 January 1967. On 3 February 1967, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona on the basis of diversity of citizenship. Following six years of federal court proceedings which included a trial and two appeals, the case was remanded to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Los Angeles City School District v. Landier Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Higgins v. GuerinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Sam Bialac, and Rental Development Corporation of America, an Arizona Corporation, Additional Party v. Harsh Building Co., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Gear v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Guard v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. VirgoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Godfrey v. HemenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Duke v. Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Rutledge v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.