Legal Opinion

Reichland Shale Products Co. v. Southern Steel & Cement Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabesON, J.

We think the record bears out the statement of the question involved, as follows: Is the receiver of an insolvent corporation required by law to pay the taxes on land, some of which was formerly owned by the said corporation, but disposed of more than a year before its insolvency, and the rest of which was owned by said corporation at the time the receivership was created, and which is heavily mortgaged and admittedly not an asset of said defendant corporation when all of said lands have been sold by the tax collectors, and the tax sales certificates therefor bought by the municipal and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. New Hanover County v. . WhitemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Carstarphen v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Shaffner v. . LipinskySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Craven County v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Charlotte v. . KavanaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Rigsbee v. . BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Logan v. . GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. City of Charlotte v. KavanaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API