Legal Opinion

City of Charlotte v. Kavanaugh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PlaiNtiee’s Appeal.

DbnNY, J.

The exceptions of the plaintiff relate to the conclusion of law holding that the city of Charlotte did not have the right to proceed under chapter 56 of the Public Laws of 1915, in making local improvements and levying assessments without regard to chapter 251 of the Private Laws of 1911, which was an act to amend the charter of the city of Charlotte, and in section 7 thereof, there appears the following provision : “Provided, further, that no assessment against any piece of property improved as in this act provided, shall in any case exceed the amount of special…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. School Commissioners v. Board of Aldermen & TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Cecil v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Bramham v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Montford v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colonial Pipeline Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. City of Reidsville v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. County School Board v. Town of HerndonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. City of Durham v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API