Legal Opinion

Carstarphen v. Town of Plymouth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

“Every person owning property is required to list, and shall make out, sign, and deliver to tbe list-taker a statement, verified by bis oath, of all tbe real and personal property, moneys, credits, investments in bonds, joint-stock companies, annuities, or otherwise, and tbe value of improvements on real estate since same was assessed, in his possession or under his control on the first day of May (italics ours), either as owner or bolder thereof, or as parent, guardian, trustee, executor, executrix, administrator, administratrix, receiver, accounting officer, partner, agent, factor, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Wilmington v. James Sprunt & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Town of Shelby v. TiddySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Edgecombe County v. WalstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. New Hanover County v. . WhitemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Town of Asheboro v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Reichland Shale Products Co. v. Southern Steel & Cement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Bond v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API