Legal Opinion

Craven County v. . Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdaks, J.

It is made tbe duty • of tbe board of commissioners or other governing body of a county to foreclose certificates held by tbe county for the sale of real estate for taxes. Q. S., 8037. For this purpose the plaintiff brought suit against the defendant Parker, owner and mortgagor of the land, and the defendant, Rasberry, who is mortgagee. The only answer filed is that of Rasberry. He attacks the judgment on the ground that the sheriff failed to serve on the delinquent taxpayer a copy of the advertisement of sale as provided by C. S., 8013, and cites Matthews v. Fry, 141 N. C., 582, as authority…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Farmer v. . BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Norton v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. King v. Cooper.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Den Ex Dem. Proctor v. PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Stewart v. . CarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Lee v. BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Stewart v. CarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Lee v. . BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API