Legal Opinion

Rigsbee v. . Brogden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1936PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

This is an administration suit, brought under C. S., 135, to determine the liability of decedent’s estate for the items enumerated in the complaint, and to fix the order or priority of their payment, if liability be found. Fisher v. Trust Co., 138 N. C., 90, 50 S. E., 592.

It is conceded on all hands that with the exception of the homestead rights and the rights of a widow, which generally are superior to the claims of creditors, the debts of a decedent must be paid, if he leave anything with which to pay them, and if his estate be not sufficient to pay his debts in full, then they are to be…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Miller v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Fisher v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Murchison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  5. New Hanover County v. . WhitemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Allen Ex Rel. Allen v. HunnicuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Citizens Bank of Marshall v. GahaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Raleigh v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Riddick v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API