Legal Opinion

People v. Kuntz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 4, 1997No. 97SA164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline case, the respondent defaulted before the hearing board. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of the hearing board that the respondent be disbarred and pay restitution as a condition for readmission. We accept the panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1976. On January 8,1996, we ordered that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months with the requirement that he must petition for reinstatement. See People v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. TownshendSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. SteinmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. KuntzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. ZiankovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. People v. BlaséSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. People v. HookerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. People v. ClyneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API