Legal Opinion

Jurgevich v. District Court, Routt County

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 20, 1995No. 95SA237PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vollack

In this original proceeding, we directed the Routt County District Court to show cause for denying the petitioner, Stanley Jurgevich, use of a transcript from his earlier trial in order to prepare a pro se motion for postcon-viction relief pursuant to Crim.P. 35(c), 7B C.R.S. (1984). The district court denied Jurgevich’s motion for use of the transcript on the grounds that Jurgevich had failed to assert a basis for using the transcript in obtaining postconviction relief. Jurgevich contends that, as an indigent, he is constitutionally entitled to a free transcript in order to prepare his…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Wright v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. People v. TownshendSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. LeeColorado Court of Appeals · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API