Legal Opinion

Mead v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 18, 1952PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of contract upon an implied warranty of merchantability in the sale to the plaintiff by the defendant of a bottle of coca cola from an automatic vending machine owned and maintained by the defendant. The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied subject to its exception, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant having through inadvertence failed to file its bill of exceptions within the prescribed time, the judge reported the case on the issues whether there was evidence for the jury of the breach of an implied warranty of merchantability…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Idzykowski v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Jamrog v. H. L. Handy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Guthrie v. J. J. Newberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. McCarthy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Crotty v. Shartenberg's-New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Taylor v. JacobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API