Legal Opinion

Cambiano v. Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 2004No. 03-1341PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellant, Mark Cambiano, stice. to challenge the decision of the Board of Law Examiners in denying his application to be readmitted to the bar under § 24 of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law (“Procedures”). We affirm the decision of the Board because the five-year waiting period applies, and having been disbarred on August 9, 2000, five years has not passed since appellant’s disbarment.

Appellant has two previous appeals in this court from his disbarment proceeding. We affirmed the dismissal of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Kellar v. Fayetteville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ligon v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Ligon v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Smith v. MullarkeySupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. In Re Rule on Judicial Disciplinary Enforcement: Interim SuspensionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API