Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Rule on Judicial Disciplinary Enforcement: Interim Suspension

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 2025Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2025 Ark. 120

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered: June 12, 2025 IN RE RULE ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT: INTERIM SUSPENSION PER CURIAM In response to a request of the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission to adopt a rule on the interim suspension of judges, the court hereby adopts a modified version of the American Bar Association Model Rule on interim suspension. The new rule will appear as Rule 1.4 in the Rules of Judicial Conduct. The adoption of this rule requires the amendment of Rule 2.16 of the Rules of Judicial Conduct. The adoption of Rule 1.4 and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ashby v. Civil Service CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cambiano v. Arkansas State Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. WILLIAM ASA HUTCHINSON III v. ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, PANEL A, , Lisa Ballard, Executive Director, Supreme Court Office of Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API