Legal Opinion

State v. Schaffer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 27, 2002No. 1 CA-CR 01-0453PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The State appeals the dismissal of an aggravated assault charge against David Rodney Schaffer (“Defendant”). Because we conclude that a prosthetic device can be a “dangerous instrument” within the meaning of the aggravated assault statute, see Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1204(A)(2) (Supp.2001), 1 we reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 A grand jury indicted Defendant on two counts of aggravated assault. Count One charged that Defendant, while “using a prosthetic arm, a deadly weapon or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. VandiverMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Kahn v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State of Arizona v. Amy Kay GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. State of Arizona v. Scott Allen KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State v. HardySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API