State v. Schaffer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The State appeals the dismissal of an aggravated assault charge against David Rodney Schaffer (“Defendant”). Because we conclude that a prosthetic device can be a “dangerous instrument” within the meaning of the aggravated assault statute, see Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1204(A)(2) (Supp.2001), 1 we reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 A grand jury indicted Defendant on two counts of aggravated assault. Count One charged that Defendant, while “using a prosthetic arm, a deadly weapon or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. VandiverMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Kahn v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State of Arizona v. Amy Kay GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Scott Allen KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. HardySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.