State v. Gordon
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Anthony Gordon (defendant) appeals from convictions for burglary, kidnapping, and sexual assault. He makes two challenges: first, the trial court wrongly enhanced his sentences under A.R.S. § 13-604.02 by allowing the jury to find that his fists constituted dangerous instruments under A.R.S. § 13-105(8); second, the trial court erred by imposing consecutive instead of concurrent sentences. He contends because the charges arose from the same act, A.R.S. § 13-116 requires concurrent sentences.
Because defendant received a life sentence, we have jurisdiction under…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarreonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StroudArizona Supreme Court · 2005
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.