Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 16, 2008No. 1 CA-CR 07-1070PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Judge. *

¶ 1 The State appeals the trial court’s dismissal of an indictment, which charged Leonel Martinez (“Martinez”) with aggravated assault, a class four felony. In an issue of first impression in this state, this court is asked to determine whether a prosthesis is a “body part” for purposes of Arizona’s aggravated assault statute, Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1204(A)(3) (Supp. 2007). 1 We hold that a prosthesis is not a body organ or body part under the plain meaning of A.R.S. § 13-1204(A)(3). However, we also hold that damage or destruction of a prosthesis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. TakacsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. State v. MentolaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Jessie T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. State v. BegayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API