Legal Opinion
Kahn v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 30, 1995No. 2 CA-CV 95-0167PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.
Appellant Edmond D. Kahn 1 appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees the City of Tucson Affirmative Action Division, City Manager’s Office, Human Relations Commission, and officers thereof. Kahn contends that appellees violated the Human Relations Ordinance of the Tucson Code when they failed to investigate his claims that certain discounts for senior citizens and children constitute illegal age discrimination. The superior court concluded on public policy grounds that such discounts are reasonable and found no violation of the ordinance.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- New York State Club Assn., Inc. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Dallas v. StanglinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Alliedsignal, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Yes on Prop 200 v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.