Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 14, 2011No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0311PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Scott King was convicted after a jury trial of negligent homicide, a dangerous-nature offense. The trial court sentenced him to an enhanced, mitigated, four-year term of imprisonment. 1 On appeal, King argues the court erred in 1) admitting in-eourt and videotaped demonstration evidence; 2) instructing the jury on accomplice liability; and 3) denying his motion to dismiss the dangerous-nature allegation. For the reasons stated below, we affirm King’s conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SprangCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State of Arizona v. Joseph Javier RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. State of Arizona v. Joseph Javier RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. State of Arizona v. Joseph Javier RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API