Mahoney v. Gano
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNew, C. J.
This was an action by the appellees against the appellants to recover the possession of certain merchandise which, on the 31st of July, 1888, was sold and delivered by the appellees under the firm name of Howell Gano & Co., of Cincinnati, Ohio, to William G. Betts and Isaac W. Craig, under the name and style of Betts & Craig, and doing business as merchants at Darlington, in this State.
The complaint was answered by a general denial by all who were made defendants, except Walter Hulett and Robert A. Craig, who answered, disclaiming any interest in the property.
The cause was tried by the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Curme, Dunn & Co. v. RauhIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. ErwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Engleman v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- McNeese v. McNeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Barkley v. BarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Smeekens v. BertrandIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Kackley v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.