Kackley v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The error assigned in this court is that the Daviess Circuit Court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. Several reasons are contained in the motion for a new trial, but only two have been argued by counsel for appellant. These two are that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and the law, and that the court erred in refusing and giving instructions.
We have carefully read the evidence, and it is perhaps true that there is ample evidence in the record to have justified a verdict in behalf of appellee, but we are not able to agree with counsel that the evidence is all one…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Walker v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Mahoney v. GanoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- State ex rel. Croy v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- McKendry v. Sinker, Davis & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eggart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
- Heaston v. KriegIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Globe Accident Insurance v. HelwigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Gray v. ElzrothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Plummer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.