Legal Opinion

Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Erwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 8613PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the appellee, the plaintiff below, alleged in substance, in his complaint, that he was the owner and entitled to the possession of four hundred bushels of wheat then in “White-Line Car, E. & T. H., No. 1887,” standing on the side-track at Miller’s Station, in Gibson county, Indiana, of the value of $375, which the appellant, the Evansville and Terre Haute Railroad Company, had possession of without right, and unlawfully detained from the appellee; wherefore, etc.

On the application of the appellant George H. Start, he was made a defendant in this action. The cause was put at issue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Saltus & Saltus v. EverettNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Barnard v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Hirschorn v. CanneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Adams v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Gibson v. . TobeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Curme, Dunn & Co. v. RauhIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Crall & Ostrander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. People v. TomasovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. City of South Bend v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API