Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. United Bank & Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1929No. Docket No. 6684PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants to recover a bank deposit. The bank appeared and answered^, The defendant Cosette D. Allan, as administratrix of the estate of Margaret J. Allan, appeared and answered and filed a cross-complaint. The cross-complaint was answered, and on the issues so framed a trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the defendant administratrix, and from the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff has appealed and has brought up a bill of exceptions.

On the twenty-seventh day of August, 1903, Margaret J. Allan was adjudged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harper v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In Re Estate of SchandoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Johnson v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Hodgdon v. S. Pac. R.R Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gottesman v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Carroll v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gibson v. WestobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. In re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of CarnigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Estate of GinsbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API