Legal Opinion

United States v. Naegele

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 2, 2006No. Crim. 05-0151 (PLF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motions to dismiss Counts 1 through 4, 9 and 10 of the indictment, and on defendant’s motion to strike a portion of Count 11. Argument was heard on the motions on April 12, 2006. Upon consideration of the arguments of the parties, as stated in their briefs and in open court, the Court grants defendant’s motions to dismiss Counts 1, 2, 3 and 9, denies defendant’s motions to dismiss Counts 4 and 10, and denies defendant’s motion to strike.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant Timothy Naegele is an attorney licensed to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Harry Herbert Wagner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. Fred J. LighteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph DemioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. United States v. ChujoyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
  4. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API