Legal Opinion
United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph Demio
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 18, 1997No. 96-3084PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals from the dismissal of count two of an indictment charging Mary Rose Oakar, a former Member of the United States House of Representatives, with violating the False Statement Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1994), by failing to disclose certain personal liabilities in a financial disclosure form that she submitted to the House Clerk pursuant to the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (“Ethics Act”), 5 U.S.C. app. 4. The United…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- United States v. Dorcely, DanielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Albert J. Pirro, Jr., Anthony G. PirroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Sabri YakouCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.