Legal Opinion
United States v. Naegele
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 18, 2007No. Criminal No. 05-0151 (PLF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment for misconduct by the prosecution. Upon careful consideration of the entire record in this ease, the Court will deny the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant Timothy Naegele is an attorney licensed to practice law in California and in the District of Columbia. Naegele owns his own law firm as a sole proprietorship. On or about March 29, 2000, Nae-gele filed a Chapter 7 petition for personal bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia. See…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Andres Soberon, Armando Cartaya, Franklin PenaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Darrell H. Strouse James R. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. FeurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Menelaos Saridakis and Lisa SaridakisUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013