Home Insurance Company v. Pugh
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Judge.
A.ppellee-wife originally filed suit individually for $4,500 against appellant-insurer on a homeowner’s insurance policy. As a result of defensive pleadings by appellant, the complaint was amended to include appellee-husband as a party-plaintiff.
The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, found for the appellee-wife, individually, and entered a judgment in her favor for $3,715. Appeal by appellant-insurer is taken from this judgment.
The evidence tends to reveal that appellees were insured under a homeowner’s policy issued by appellant-insurer; that the property…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kosior v. Continental Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- McLeod v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Bellman v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Karow v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Klemens v. Badger Mutual Insurance Co. of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Hosey v. Seibels Bruce Group, S.C. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Ryan v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- McFarland v. Utica Fire Insurance Co. of Oneida County, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997