Legal Opinion

Kosior v. Continental Insurance Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1938PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The plaintiff and her husband owned land and buildings as tenants in common and the buildings were insured against fire by policies issued by the defendants to “John T. and Tofeld Kosior and their legal representatives.” The “Tofeld” Kosior, so described in the policies, is the plaintiff, Teofila Kosior, in these suits. The plaintiff brings these bills in her own name, with a recital in each that “she files . . . [it] simultaneously with the commencement of an action at law against this defendant on the same policy, in which action she and her said husband John T. Kosior join as parties…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Weidman v. WeidmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Bellman v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Edward Rose Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Paulauskas v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  2. Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  5. Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API