Legal Opinion

Hosey v. Seibels Bruce Group, S.C. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 29, 1978No. 77-192PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover on an insurance policy covering property located at 903 South St. Andrews Street, Dothan, Alabama. Felston Hosey, Sr. obtained the policy from the Seibels Bruce Group, particularly the South Carolina Insurance Company. By its terms, the policy was to remain in effect for ten months beginning October 4, 1974. It provided fire insurance in the amount of $24,000 for the dwelling, $2,400 in coverage for appurtenant structures, $12,000 in coverage for unscheduled personal property and $4,800 in coverage for additional living expenses.

The policy contained two provisions…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  3. Feibelman v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Gardner v. DorseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Feazell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. American Economy Insurance v. LiggettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Maravich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Republic Insurance Co. v. JerniganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API