Legal Opinion

Campbell v. City of Troy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1972No. Docket 12206PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

Plaintiff, Carl Campbell, was employed by defendant, City of Troy, as its Superintendent of Public Works from June 15, 1959, until his mandatory retirement on December 31, 1967. Plaintiff received an annual salary for his services. The demands of the job required him to work *536overtime on numerous occasions. Plaintiff received no payment for this overtime work. Instead he accumulated compensatory time. At his retirement, plaintiff had accumulated 966-1/2 hours of compensatory time. He was paid for 80. He now seeks payment for the remaining 886-1/2 hours for which he received no compensation.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cascaden v. MagrytaMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City of Detroit v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Holt v. StoffletMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Satterley v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Superior Ambulance Service v. City of Lincoln ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Barber v. Smh (Us), IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Ulrich v. Federal Land BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Martin v. East Lansing School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Liggett Restaurant Group, Inc. v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Burton v. William Beaumont HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API