Legal Opinion

Cascaden v. Magryta

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 60, Calendar No. 34,180PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.Wiest, J.

This is' a suit in assumpsit, with declaration upon the common counts, brought by plaintiffs to recover from defendants compensation for repairing a house damaged by fire. In the circuit the case was heard by the court, and judgment entered for defendants.-

The legal question, presented by a most unsatisfactory record, may be stated as follows: In case of damage, by fire, to a residence, being purchased under land contract and occupied as a homestead by the purchasers, may [if] parties called by an adjuster, representing' an insurance company thought to be liable for the loss, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farmer v. BestMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wrench Llc, a Michigan Limited Liability Company Joseph Shields Thomas Rinks v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kammer Asphalt Paving Co. v. East China Township SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Callano v. Oakwood Park Homes Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API