Legal Opinion

Satterley v. City of Flint

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1964No. Calendar 45, Docket 50,005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Plaintiffs, employees of the fire department of Flint, brought a class suit for compensation, claiming they should have been paid for 63 hours per week instead of 44 because of an amendment to the city charter, adopted October 23, 1951. The trial judge granted them judgments in excess of $3,000,000. The defendant city appeals.

The city of Flint charter was adopted in 1929 and then provided that the compensation of city employees should be prescribed by the city commission. In 1935 a civil service amendment was added to the charter and the principle was set up that:

“Like classifications of work…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kane v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Campbell v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Advo-Systems, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Gladden v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. City of Detroit Board of Fire Commissioners v. Detroit Fire Fighters Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API