Legal Opinion
Fleming v. Lowell Sun Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 22, 1940No. 976PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
An application has been filed by Philip B. Fleming, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, against the Lowell Sun Company, the respondent, praying that an order be issued directing the respondent to show cause why .it should not be required to appear before the petitioner, or his authorized representative, and .produce the books, records, documents, and papers, and give evidence as required by a subpoena duces tecum issued by Charles R. Hersum, Acting Regional Director of the Wage and Hour Division, under authority conferred on him…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Andrew E. Hill and J.E. Pinkerton, United States of America v. Dennis Juren, United States of America v. Edward W. CromeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Schroepfer v. A. S. Abell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Publishers New Press, Inc. v. MoyseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.