Neher v. Harwood
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought suit against the postmaster at La Verne, California (appellee), to enjoin him from carrying into effect á fraud order dated June 28, 1941, issued by the Postmaster General of the United States pursuant to the Postal Fraud Order Statute, 39 U.S.C.A. § 259, and after a noticed hearing in Washington, D. C., at which appellant did not appear but did file a brief in regard thereto after the taking of testimony.' Appellant by the bill sought to have the fraud order declared void for the following reasons : ,(1) The findings of fact do not show violation o-f…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Keegan v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Varney v. WarehimeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Payne, Postmaster v. Fite. Payne, Postmaster v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Summerfield v. Sunshine Book Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.