Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Redding

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 831SC222PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motions for directed verdict, at the close of plaintiffs evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence, on the issue of alienation of affections. Defendant contends that plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence that any alienation of affections was caused by wrongful acts of defendant. We do not agree.

Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict presents the question whether, as a matter of law, the evidence is sufficient to entitle plaintiff to have the jury pass on it. The evidence must be considered in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Rickenbaker v. RickenbakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Heist v. HeistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Scott v. KikerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gray v. HooverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Perrin v. Meyer (In Re Meyer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1988
  3. Shaw v. StringerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Beavers v. McMicanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API