Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Stringer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1991No. 8921SC226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The ten arguments defendant makes in his brief — none of which refer to the assignments of error that they are based on as Rule 28(b)(5) of our appellate rules requires — raise only three questions for determination; as some of the arguments address the same basic issue as others, some concern formal matters of no consequence to the appeal, and others are based on grounds either not asserted in the trial or properly assigned as error. The three questions that defendant effectively raises and which we will address in sequence are: Did the court err to defendant’s prejudice in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Powell v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Donavant v. HudspethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Chappell v. ReddingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horner v. ByrnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Webster Enterprises, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Brown v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Peake v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API