Legal Opinion

Gray v. Hoover

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 1989No. 8821SC874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Plaintiff, William L. Gray, brought this action against defendant, Wallace Neil Hoover, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for alienation of affections and criminal conversation. Plaintiff was the only witness to testify at trial. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict as to the alienation of affections claim. The criminal conversation issue was submitted to the jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $30,000 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages. The trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Clark v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Kimmel v. BrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Harvey v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. McCutchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Matter of Estate of TrogdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Horner v. ByrnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Brown v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API