Legal Opinion

Black v. Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1985No. 84-236PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issues presented by this appeal are whether the common pleas court abused its discretion in refusing to conduct a trial de novo or erred in its valuation of UCB’s property and whether a discriminatory level of assessment was applied. We hold that the court of common pleas did not abuse its discretion in disallowing a trial de novo. We further hold that the court’s method of valuation and application of a uniform rate of assessment were proper.

R.C. 5717.05 defines the parameters of an appeal from the board of revision to the court of common pleas, and states, in pertinent part, that:

“* * *…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Park Investment Co. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Jennings & Churella Construction Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Koblenz v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State ex rel. Park Investment Co. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Rancho Cincinnati Rivers, L.L.C. v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Murray & Co. Marina, Inc. v. Erie County Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API