Legal Opinion

Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-1098PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

The Columbus Board of Education contends that the BTA acted unreasonably and unlawfully when it presumed the BOR’s decisions to be valid. We agree.

A review of the BTA’s decision in this matter makes it clear that the standard of review which the BTA applied was incorrect.

R.C. 5717.01 provides that upon the filing of an appeal from a decision of the county board of revision, the board of revision “shall thereupon certify to the board of tax appeals a transcript of the record of the proceedings of the county board of revision * * * and all evidence offered in connection therewith.” R.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Black v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Coventry Towers, Inc. v. City of StrongsvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Amsdell v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Colonial Village, Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Sapina v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Plain Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API