Goodall v. Jack
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Chispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant Jack was, during the times mentioned in the complaint, a stockholder of a corporation called the West Coast-Land Company, and this action is brought to recover the proportionate share of defendant as such stockholder of a debt of the corporation alleged to have been incurred to one J. R Knowles for money borrowed from him by the corporation on the fifteenth day of May, 1894. In his answer the defendant pleads, among other things, that the al leged cause of action is barred by the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 338 and section 359 of the Code of Civil Procedure.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bank of San Luis Obispo v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Winona Wagon Co. v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. Goldtree Bros. Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Fry v. Baltimore Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- More v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Brown v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- O'Neill v. QuarnstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907