Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1209 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Martha Hartley (Claimant) has been denied unemployment compensation benefits because of willful misconduct under the provisions of Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e). Claimant was employed as a dental assistant-receptionist at the time of her discharge. She had certain office responsibilities which her employer testified she had not fulfilled over a period of time. According to the employer, the Claimant’s failure to perform her specified duties and her violation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Hohnstock Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Rodites v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Process Lettering, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Williams v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. American General Life & Accident Insurance v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Philadelphia Geriatric Center v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Selan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API