Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
In James v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 489, 296 A. 2d 288 (1972), we recognized that racial discrimination could be the compelling and necessitous cause for a voluntary termination of employment and, where the record disclosed by substantial evidence that such was the fact, the claimant would be entitled to unemployment compensation benefits.
We are concerned here with appeals in four cases from four orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) disallowing appeals from adjudications of a Referee denying the claims…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- James v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Harmer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Philadelphia Coke Division, Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Smith Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hinkle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Schappe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of Commonwealth v. KellsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.