Legal Opinion

Hohnstock Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1961No. Appeal, No. 264PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case, the bureau, the referee and the board in turn concluded that the claimant was disqualified under the provision of §402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §802(e).

This sub-section provides that an employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week “In which his unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for willful misconduct connected with his work; . , .”

The board found that the claimant had a history of unreported and unauthorized absences and that “Although work was scheduled for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Devlin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Shanor Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Soilis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Department of LaborSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. American Process Lettering, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Blystone v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Hartley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API