Legal Opinion

Rodites v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1978No. Appeal, No. 2318 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Anestos Rodites (claimant) appeals here from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying him unemployment compensation. He was found guilty of willful misconduct, grounds for ineligibility pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Law), 43 P.S. §802(e).

The claimant had been employed as a laborer by the City of Arnold for approximately one year. He was discharged following refusal to sign a statement of rules and regulations, which the City was requiring all of its employees to sign,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Board v. StilesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. VojtasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Nehi Bottling Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Wilson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. LeeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lake v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Gane v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Katz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Hartley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Parmelee, Miller, Welsh & Kratz, P.C. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API